English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We systematically analyze the recent claim that nonrelativistic andrelativistic mean field (RMF) based random phase approximation (RPA)calculations for the centroid energy E_0 of the isoscalar giant monopoleresonance yield for the nuclear matter incompressibility coefficient, K_{nm},values which differ by about 20%. For an appropriate comparison with the RMFbased RPA calculations, we obtain the parameters for the Skyrme force used inthe nonrelativistic model by adopting the same procedure as employed in thedetermination of the NL3 parameter set of an effective Lagrangian used in theRMF model. Our investigation suggest that the discrepancy between the values ofK_{nm} predicted by the relativistic and nonrelativistic models issignificantly less than 20%.Comment: Revtex file (13 pages), appearing in PRC-Rapid Com

Nuclear matter incompressibility coefficient in relativistic and nonrelativistic microscopic models