English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A mistake in our recent paper has been found, namely, a misinterpretation of the magnetic structure analysis (p. 7, second column, second and third paragraphs). Nevertheless, the reported magnetic structure (Fig. 9) was correct. During the analysis, the c component of the magnetic moment (mc) for 2 mistakenly was considered to be similar to 1, which led to equal quality of fits for both 1 and 2. However, the correct sequences for mc (+ − +−) for 1 and (+ − −+) for 2 are different. The analysis with the corrected sequences reveals that the refinement with 2(Rmag = 26.8%) does not fit the experimental magnetic pattern. Only 1 reproduces the experimental magnetic pattern at 1.5 K (Rmag = 11.8%). Therefore, the magnetic structure follows 1. The corrected paragraph [for paragraphs 2 and 3 of the original paper (p. 7, second column)] should be read as “The refinement of the magnetic structure was attempted for all four ’s. Only 1 reproduces the experimental magnetic pattern at 1.5 K (Rmag = 11.8%) [Fig. 8(c)]. The basis vectors for 1 (Table IV) indicate that all three components of the magnetic moment are refinable. Their simultaneous refinement yields ma = 0.22(6) μB, mb = −0.03(9) μB , and mc = 1.74(3) μB with the total magnetic moment of m = 1.75(8) μB at 1.5 K. The component mb is zero within the standard deviation, and an equal quality of the fit was obtained with mb = 0, in agreement with the experiment, where M(H ) is linear in low fields and no signatures of net magnetization or hysteresis are observed (Fig. 5). In contrast, a finite mb value would lead to a weakly ferromagnetic structure at odds with the experiment. Therefore, we conclude that the mb component is zero. The obtained values indicate that the spins are lying on the ac plane with a predominant component along the c axis. The ordered moment is about 10% smaller than the spin-only value of 2 μB for S = 1 and 25% smaller than the full moment of gSμB = 2.33 μB expected for g = 2.33 when the contribution of the orbital moment is included for this sample.”

physical review. b./physical review. b

Erratum: Stripe order on the spin-1 stacked honeycomb lattice in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Ba</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>Ni</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>PO</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> [Phys. Rev. B <b>95</b> , 024401 (2017)]

Erratum: Stripe order on the spin-1 stacked honeycomb lattice in Ba2Ni(PO4)2 [Phys. Rev. B 95 , 024401 (2017)]