English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In their Comment, Greer et al (i) put us in charge of a pretended wrongclaim, which we never made in Phys.~Rev.~B {\bf 78}, 115315 (2008), where wecriticized a method (DG)proposed by two of them, (ii) incorrectly claim thatthe DG method can reproduce the conductance quantum $g_0$, but (iii) to deduce$g_0$ for a toy model, they carry out calculations within the standard Landauermethod, which has nothing to do with the DG's. We present results for theirmodel obtained within the DG method, which demonstrate that the DG method failsas lamentably as in the examples we presented in our earlier work. We alsoanalyze the physical reasons why the DG method fails.

Reply to Comment on "Electron transport through correlated molecules computed using the time-independent Wigner function: Two critical tests''