English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In his Comment, Krakoviack [Phys. Rev. B (2007)] finds that the phasebehavior of the s+p spin-glass model is different from what proposed byCrisanti and Leuzzi [Phys. Rev. B 73, 014412 (2006)] if s and p are larger thantwo and are separated well enough. He proposes a trial picture, based on a onestep replica symmetry breaking solution, displaying a mode-coupling-likeglass-to-glass transition line ending in a A3 singularity. However, actually,the physics of these systems changes when p-s is large, the instability ofwhich the one step replica symmetry breaking glassy phase suffers turns out tobe so wide ranging that the whole scenario proposed by Krakoviack must beseriously reconsidered.

Reply to Comment on ``Spherical 2+p spin-glass model: an analytically solvable model with a glass-to-glass transition''