English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We refute all claims of the "Comment on "Normalization of quasinormal modesin leaky optical cavities and plasmonic resonators" " by E. A. Muljarov and W.Langbein (arXiv:1602.07278v1). Based entirely on information already containedin our original article (P. T. Kristensen, R.-C. Ge and S. Hughes, PhysicalReview A 92, 053810 (2015)), we dismiss every point of criticism as beingcompletely unjustified and point out how important parts of our argumentationappear to have been overlooked by the Comment Authors. In addition, we provideadditional calculations showing directly the link between the normalizations bySauvan et al. and Muljarov et al., which were not included in our originalarticle.

Reply to "Comment on "Normalization of quasinormal modes in leaky optical cavities and plasmonic resonators" " by E. A. Muljarov and W. Langbein