English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

To comply with the critique of the Comment [J. Arrington, arXiv:1602.01461],we consider another modification of the proton electric form factor, whichresolves the "proton-radius puzzle". The proposed modification satisfies allthe consistency criteria put forward in the Comment, and yet has a similarimpact on the puzzle as that of the original paper. Contrary to the concludingstatement of the Comment, it is not difficult to find an ad hoc modification ofthe form factor at low $Q$ that resolves the discrepancy and is consistent withanalyticity constraints. We emphasize once again that we do not consider suchan ad hoc modification of the proton form factor to be a solution of the puzzleuntil a physical mechanism for it is found.

Reply to "Comment on `Breakdown of the expansion of finite-size corrections to the hydrogen Lamb shift in moments of charge distribution'"