English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Recently, Pawlowski [Phys. Rev. A 82, 032313 (2010)] claimed to have proventhe security of a quantum key distribution by using only the monogamy of Bell'sinequality violations. In the proof, however, he tacitly assumed that theeavesdropper's outcome is binary. The assumption cannot be justified becauseEve's (eavesdropper's) power can only be limited by natural principle. Weprovide a counter-example for a step of the proof.

Comment on "Security Proof for Cryptographic Protocols Based Only on Monogamy of Bell's Inequality Violations"