English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this short note we reply to a comment by Callegaro et al. [1](arXiv:2009.11709) that points out some weakness of the model ofindeterministic physics that we proposed in Ref. [2] (Physical Review A,100(6), p.062107), based on what we named "finite information quantities"(FIQs). While we acknowledge the merit of their criticism, we maintain that itapplies only to a concrete example that we discussed in [2], whereas the mainconcept of FIQ remains valid and suitable for describing indeterministicphysical models. We hint at a more sophisticated way to define FIQs which,taking inspiration from intuitionistic mathematics, would allow to overcome thecriticisms in [1].

Reply to a "Comment on 'Physics without determinism: Alternative interpretations of classical physics' "