English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We provide a comprehensive genomic and epigenomic map of the more than 500,000 endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) and fragments that populate the intergenic regions of the human genome. The repressive epigenetic marks associated with the ERVs, particularly long terminal repeats (LTRs), show a remarkable switch in silencing mechanisms, depending on the evolutionary age of the LTRs. Young LTRs tend to be CpG rich and are mainly suppressed by DNA methylation, whereas intermediate age LTRs are associated predominantly with histone modifications, particularly histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methylation. Young LTRs can be reactivated by treatment with the DNA methylation inhibitor 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-aza-CdR) alone, but their level of expression is much increased by 5-aza-CdR treatment plus knockdown of one of several H3K9 methyltransferases or of the H3K27 methyltransferase EZH2. The removal of cytosine methylation led to rapid, widespread increases in H3K9me3 in the LTRs. Intermediate age LTRs had lower CpG densities and were not up-regulated by 5-aza-CdR treatment, but they were sensitive to knockdown of H3K9 methyltransferases. Unlike the situation in embryonic stem cells, the polycomb repressive complex (PRC2) has a minor role in LTR suppression by itself and is only a player after removal of cytosine methylation in the analyzed cancer cell line. Up-regulation of LTRs and induction of “viral mimicry” is rapidly becoming of interest for predicting cancer patient response to epigenetic therapies. Understanding the mechanism for LTR suppression is of major importance in order to improve patient treatment strategies.

Switching roles for DNA and histone methylation depend on evolutionary ages of human endogenous retroviruses