English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The decision of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes [ICSP, an IUMS COMCOF (Committees, Commissions and Federations)] to enforce the mandatory deposit of nomenclatural types of archaea and bacteria in two publicly accessible services was considered necessary to ensure that type strains are available to the international scientific community for the purpose of systematic research. A comparable deposition policy does not exist for non-type strains. Journal editors’ prompts to authors to make novel organisms, viruses and vectors available to all qualified members of the scientific community are nothing more than weak ineffective recommendations and are not enforceable. Not only editors, but also reviewers and authors, fail to follow a fundamental foundation regarding the publication of scientific data, which is the potential for other researchers to verify the published data. Obviously, the plea for voluntary deposition is insufficient to convince authors to share strains among their peers and to ensure that microbial diversity is archived in the long-term for confirmation, repetition and extension of scientific data.

Towards a strategy to enhance access to microbial diversity