English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Minute 5. Current position regarding species epithet changes recently proposed within Streptococcus and Staphylococcus. Following several name (species epithet) changes effected on the grounds of grammatical correctness, particularly within the genus Streptococcus [Trüper & de’ Clari, Int J Syst Bacteriol 47 (1997), 908–909; Trüper & de’ Clari, Int J Syst Bacteriol 48 (1998), 615], and subsequent arguments against this, particularly with regard to older established names [Kilian, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51 (2001), 723–724], M. Kilian reported that his formal request for the retention of older, well-established names had been rejected by the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes and that, inevitably, a line would be drawn under the matter with the eventual appearance of the new names in the forthcoming 2nd edition of Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology.

International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Subcommittee on the taxonomy of staphylococci and streptococci