English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Chlamydia pneumoniae is a common respiratory tract pathogen. Serological methods currently used for the diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection lack specificity, give ambiguous results from a single serum sample and often provide only a retrospective diagnosis. A prospective study was undertaken to assess whether PCR could be a useful addition to the serological techniques routinely practised for diagnosis. This study investigated 68 adult patients with a diagnosis of acute respiratory infection. Acute and convalescent serological determination of antibodies to C. pneumoniae were performed by means of an rELISA test and a micro-immunofluorescence (MIF) test. Nasopharyngeal aspirates or bronchoalveolar lavage specimens and bronchial aspirates obtained from the 68 patients were evaluated by PCR-enzyme immunoassay (PCR-EIA) for the presence of C. pneumoniae and by immunofluorescence assay and cell culture for virus identification. Mycoplasma pneumoniae serology was also performed. Eight patients (11.8%) were positive by either rELISA or PCR-EIA, or both, with an infection rate of 5 (18.5%) of 27 in patients with community-acquired pneumonia, 2 (9%) of 22 in asthmatic patients and 1 (5%) of 19 in patients with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Serological evidence of acute infection was found in four of these patients with the rELISA test and in three others with the MIF test. PCR-EIA detected C. pneumoniae DNA in four specimens, but there were concordant results with both rELISA and PCR-EIA in only one patient A positive PCR-EIA was also obtained in a patient who did not show an antibody response in acute serum. The discrepancy between serological and PCR-EIA results reflects the difficulties in routine laboratory diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection and the necessity for further studies with optimised techniques.

journal of medical microbiology/journal of medical microbiology

Comparison of two serological methods and a polymerase chain reaction-enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of acute respiratory infections with Chlamydia pneumoniae in adults