English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

SUMMARY: A strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens that had been isolated from a freshwater source on a plastic substratum was grown in continuous culture in minimal medium. The ‘adsubble’ process (adsorptive bubble separation process) was found to foam-fractionate wild-type cells from the fermenter during flow conditions. This selection pressure favoured the enrichment of two major classes of mutant, both having cell surface characteristics fundamentally different from the wild-type. The wild-type produced very little extracellular polysaccharide, whereas a ‘mucoid’ mutant, found predominantly in the aqueous-phase, produced an alginate exopolymer. The second class of mutant was isolated from the walls of the fermenter and, like the wild-type, produced little exopolymer. This mutant, with crenated colony morphology, showed increased attachment to solid surfaces compared to the wild-type and mucoid cells when assayed for attachment to polystyrene surfaces for 2 h. Outer-membrane protein, lipopolysaccharides and exopolysaccharides of the wild-type and both mutants were analysed. The results demonstrate the role of cell surface characteristics in the adaptability of the organism to micro-environments such as a solid/liquid or air/liquid interface or the aqueous phase.

microbiology

Selection of Attachment Mutants during the Continuous Culture of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Relationship between Attachment Ability and Surface Composition