English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Infection of human diploid cells with Simian virus 40 (SV 40) leads to an abortive virus cycle characterized by little virus production, little or no cell destruction, no inhibition of cell replicating capacity, low efficiency of induction of tumour antigen (T-antigen) and eventual transformation of the morphological, chromosomal, and growth characteristics of the cells (Koprowski et al. 1962; Shein & Enders, 1962; Rabson et al. 1962; Weinstein & Moorhead, 1965). In marked contrast, in stationary-phase primary African green monkey kidney (GMK) cells, SV 40 infection leads to high yields of virus, highly efficient induction of T-antigen and extensive cell destruction (Carp & Gilden, 1966). The determination of the cause of these marked differences might clarify the mechanism of the transformation process. Previous results indicated that the virus adsorbed and entered into eclipse phase with equal efficiency for the two cell types (Carp & Gilden, 1966).

Further Studies on the Differences in the Interaction of Simian Virus 40 with African Green Monkey Kidney and Human Diploid Cells