English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Clostridium putrificum (Trevisan 1889) Reddish and Rettger 1922; Clostridium botulinum (van Ermengem 1896) Bergey, Harrison, Breed, Hammer, and Huntoon 1923; and Clostridium sporogenes (Mechnikoff 1908) Bergey, Harrison, Breed, Hammer, and Huntoon 1923 are genetically related at the species level. We propose rejection of the name C. putrificum (which has priority) and conservation of the name C. botulinum on the basis of Rules 23a and 56a of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria and conservation of the name C. sporogenes for nontoxigenic strains according to Rules 23a and 56b.

Rejection of Clostridium putrificum and Conservation of Clostridium botulinum and Clostridium sporogenes: Request for an Opinion