English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The name Enterobacteriaceae was proposed in 1937 by Rahn to include many taxa which are now included in the family. Rahn's proposal had several nomenclatural flaws, so with the retroactive application of the rules of 1948 International Bacteriological Code of Nomenelature, both Enterobacteriaceae Rahn 1937 and Enterobacter Rahn 1937 became illegitimate. However, since the name Enterobacteriaceae had become so widely used since 1937, the Judicial Commission voted to conserve it in 1958. Both the 1958 and 1975 Bacteriological Codes contained many statements that made Enterobacteriaceae a legitimate, conserved name and the only correct name for the family. After almost 20 years of universal acceptance, the name was challenged because it was the only family name not formed by adding “aceae” to the stem of the name of the type genus as required by Rule 21a of the 1975 Bacteriological Code. On 3 September 1978, the Judicial Commission voted to conserve the name Enterobacteraceae over Enterobacteriaceae even though the former name had never been published, had no description, was illegitimate, and had no standing in nomenclature. The arguments given to reject Enterobacteriaceae and its type genus Escherichia are not supported by the principles and rules of the Bacteriological Code. The proposal has not received the support of those who work with the family. In 1975 the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology's Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Enterobacteriaceae voted 12 to 2 against any change, and in May 1980, the American Society for Microbiology's Subcommittee on Gram-Negative Facultatively Anaerobic Rods voted 7 to 0 against any change. To maintain stability in nomenclature and prevent confusion in the literature, the conserved family name Enterobacteriaceae with its designated and conserved type genus Escherichia should be maintained.

Opposition to Recent Proposals Which Would Reject the Family Name Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia As Its Type Genus