English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In a paper published in these 'Proceedings' Jeffreys puts forward a form of reasoning purporting to resolve in a particular case the primitive difficulty which besets all attempts to derive valid results of practical application from the theory of Inverse Probability. For a normally distributed variate,x , the frequency element may be writtendf =h /√πe -h 2 (x -μ )2 dx , where μ is the mean of the distribution, andh the precision constant. For the convenience of the majority of statisticians who prefer to use the standard deviation, σ, of the distribution, in place of the precision constant, we may note thath 2 = 1/2σ2 , and that this substitution may be made at any stage of the argument.

The concepts of inverse probability and fiducial probability referring to unknown parameters