English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Adsorption isotherms of nine globular proteins with molecular weight (MW) spanning 10-1000 kDa confirm that interfacial energetics of protein adsorption to a hydrophobic solid/aqueous-buffer (solid-liquid, SL) interface are not fundamentally different than adsorption to the water-air (liquid-vapour, LV) interface. Adsorption dynamics dampen to a steady-state (equilibrium) within a 1 h observation time and protein adsorption appears to be reversible, following expectations of Gibbs' adsorption isotherm. Adsorption isotherms constructed from concentration-dependent advancing contact angles theta(a) of buffered-protein solutions on methyl-terminated, self-assembled monolayer surfaces show that maximum advancing spreading pressure, Pi(a)max, falls within a relatively narrow 10 &lt; Pi(a)max &lt; 20 mN m(-1) band characteristic of all proteins studied, mirroring results obtained at the LV surface. Furthermore, Pi(a) isotherms exhibited a 'Traube-rule-like' progression in MW similar to the ordering observed at the LV surface wherein molar concentrations required to reach a specified spreading pressure Pi(a) decreased with increasing MW. Finally, neither Gibbs' surface excess quantities [Gamma(sl)-Gamma(sv)] nor Gamma(lv) varied significantly with protein MW. The ratio {[Gamma(sl)-Gamma(sv)]/Gamma(lv)} approximately 1, implying both that Gamma(sv) approximately 0 and chemical activity of protein at SL and LV surfaces was identical. These results are collectively interpreted to mean that water controls protein adsorption to hydrophobic surfaces and that the mechanism of protein adsorption can be understood from this perspective for a diverse set of proteins with very different composition.

Interfacial energetics of globular–blood protein adsorption to a hydrophobic interface from aqueous-buffer solution