English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A contrast agent can be pushed by a saline solution more effectively through a spiral flow tube than through a conventional T-shaped tube in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA). To compare the degree of contrast enhancement and signal stability in the carotid artery by using CEMRA between a spiral flow tube and a T-shaped tube.A total of 100 patients were analyzed in this retrospective study. The first 50 patients underwent CEMRA of the carotid artery with the T-shaped tube, while the last 50 patients used the spiral flow tube. Gadoterate meglumine was diluted with saline to make a total volume of 20 mL. Injection was performed with a bolus rate of 2.5 mL/s for 8 seconds. Five regions of interest (ROIs) were placed on the contrast-enhanced area in each carotid artery and the signal intensity (SI) in the ROI was used for the analysis. The ROIs on the brain stem were also placed and the average SI in this ROI was used as a reference signal. The enhancement of the artery (Eartery) was calculated as a normalized signal using the following equation: Eartery = SI in the ROI of the carotid bifurcation/SI in the ROI of the brain stem. Signal homogeneity in the contrast-enhanced area (SHenhance) was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation from the SI in the 5 ROIs. The value of SHenhance and Eartery between the data obtained from the spiral flow tube and the T-shaped tube were compared. P-values <.05 were considered significant.We found a significant difference in SHenhance between the data obtained from the spiral flow tube (0.20 ± 0.060) and the T-shaped tube (0.24 ± 0.056) (P = .001). The Eartery values significantly increased by 15% (spiral flow tube, median 14.1 with interquartile range [IQR] 11.8-15.4 vs T-shaped tube, median 12.3 IQR 11.3-14.0, P = .02) using the spiral flow tube.These findings suggest that, by using the Spiral flow tube, the homogeneity of the contrast-enhanced signal intensity in the carotid artery was significantly improved without decreasing the signal intensity in CEMRA.

medicine

Delivering the diluted contrast agent with saline via a spiral flow tube improves arterial enhancement for contrast enhancement of magnetic resonance angiography of the neck