English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

1 Maria Chasapi, MD, MRCS Andrej Salibi, MD, MRCS, MSc Plastic Surgery Department Royal Preston Hospital Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom Sir: F skin grafts (FTSGs) are commonly used in reconstruction of small defects in the head and neck region. Numerous inset techniques have been used to ensure graft take and avoid hematoma formation. These include tie-over dressings alone, tie-over dressing with quilting sutures, or quilting sutures alone, which is sometimes combined with the application of chloramphenicol (CPL)1 eye ointment over the surface of the FTSG. The advantages of insetting FTSGs without the aforementioned techniques have not yet been explored in the current literature. Therefore, we aim to present our experience in a case series reflecting equally good results. In all cases, FTSGs were taken from the supraclavicular area and were defatted. Thorough hemostasis was performed before insetting FTSGs with a running 5-0 Vicryl Rapide2 that approximates carefully the graft and wound edges. A smear of CPL eye ointment was applied over the graft surface (Fig. 1). No additional quilting sutures or dressings were used. Patients were advised to clean the wound gently with soap and water from the second postoperative day and once dried to apply CPL twice daily for 2 weeks. Our regime, as outlined earlier, was used in 27 cases requiring FTSGs after excision of facial skin cancer lesions: 15 to nose, 5 to medial canthus, 2 to lower eyelid, 2 to antihelix, and 3 to temple. Two patients were on aspirin that had not been stopped. None of the patients had a prior or family history of blood dyscrasias.3 All patients had 100% graft take on their first visit to the dressing clinic at 1 week and no complications at 3 to 4 weeks (Fig. 2). We believe that these results were achieved through our regime that combines atraumatic handling of FTSGs, minimal but appropriate suturing, attention to hemostasis, and the moisturizing effect of CPL eye ointment.1,3 This method is thought to enhance plasmatic imbibition during the initial stage of graft take. Tie-over dressings may obscure vision when used in areas such as lower eyelids or the medial canthus.1 They often dry out and adhere to the graft surface, resulting in pain and increased risk of graft failure at the first dressing change.4 Quilting sutures may also increase the risk of hematoma formation and skin puckering. We feel that the above are not essential in majority of cases, unless patients’ compliance is an issue. This was reflected in our cases with full graft take and no complications, in addition to simplifying the postoperative instructions as the absence of a tie-over

FTSG on the Face: Do We Really Need Tie-over Dressings or Quilting Sutures?