English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: At our institution, the Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap (SCAIF) has become a reliable, firstchoice option for fasciocutaneous coverage of complex Head & Neck defects. No studies have compared the outcomes of reconstructions performed with SCAIFs and free flaps directly. The aim of our study was to compare outcomes between SCAIFs and free fasciocutaneous flaps (FFF) via a single surgeon’s experience at a County Hospital.

The Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap (SCAIF) as an Ideal Option in Head & Neck Reconstruction