English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

METHODS: Stereolithography formats were obtained and reviewed for the plan and the postoperative computed tomography (CT) from patients in 5 categories: implant cranioplasty (I), cranioplasty for craniosynostosis (C), orthognathic surgery (O), mandibular reconstruction (M), and mandibular distraction (D). Digital renderings were imported and analyzed using Mimics (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium), volumetric overlays, and linear data. Each category cohort was then compared and stratified. Statistics included analysis of variance testing in SPSS statistical software package (Version 25; IBM, Armonk, N.Y.). Post hoc Bonferroni comparison was carried out for groups that displayed significant variance.

plastic and reconstructive surgery. global open

Conformity of 3-dimensional Surgical Plans With Actual Results: A Comparison of Virtual Surgical Planning Accuracy Between 5 Different Craniofacial Procedures