English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

RESULTS: Nine hundred and thirty-five academic plastic surgeons were identified with 532 having defined subspecialty training. Academic bibliometrics among subspecialty surgeons were comparable among the 5 groups with aesthetics and craniofacial surgeons displaying a preponderance of attaining more industry funding (p=0.043) and career publications respectively, with the latter not attaining statistical significance (p=0.12). Overall, research-specific funding (p=0.014) and higher funding amounts (p<0.0001) correlated with higher h-indices in tandem with higher academic rank. A funding level of $2,000 appeared to be the approximate cutoff above which scholastic productivity became apparent.

plastic and reconstructive surgery. global open

Abstract: Saw It Coming: The Correlation Between Poor Performance on the Plastic Surgery in Service Exam and Failure on the American Board Written Exam