English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Sarday, O cber 7, 2017 METHODS: DIR patients were matched to delayed patients based on age (+/5 years), body mass index (BMI) (+/2.5), and unilateral or bilateral reconstruction. Retrospective chart review was conducted to collect clinical outcomes, independent reviewers scored cosmetic outcomes (skin quality/color, scar formation, symmetry, breast contour/size/position, overall aesthetic outcome), and patients scored their satisfaction using the BREAST-Q patient reported outcomes instrument. We further examined whether other factors such as smoking, obesity, and RT influenced cosmetic results. Statistical analyses were conducted in IBM SPSS Statistics 24.

Abstract: Breast Reconstruction Following Augmentation: Management and Aesthetic Outcomes in 37 Consecutive Patients