English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The Daumas-Duport grading scheme (DDGS) is a commonly used method for determining the grade of a tumor. It scores 4 histologic features and is used as a prognostic tool in adult astroglial tumors. This system of assigning children to prognostically homogeneous groups has not been evaluated. The Childhood Brain Tumor Consortium (CBTC) database includes 327 children with a CBTC assigned World Health Organization (WHO) diagnosis of supratentorial astroglial tumor and histologic features necessary for Daumas-Duport grading. We compared survival estimates for tumors within and between DDGS grades using a slightly broadened definition of endothelial prominence. The DDGS yielded only 3 histologic groups in children and only 2 prognostically differing groups. Subgroups within DDGS grades had significantly different survival distributions. The summing of 4 disparate histologic features in the DDGS is inadequate for the assessment of childhood supratentorial astroglial tumors. A classification system more fully summarizing the complete histologic content of tumors is most likely to provide diagnoses useful for clinical purposes.

Prognostic Limitations of the Daumas-Duport Grading Scheme in Childhood Supratentorial Astroglial Tumors