English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Center rot of onion, caused by Pantoea ananatis, is an economically important disease in onion production in Georgia and elsewhere in the United States. Growers rely on frequent foliar applications of bactericides and, in some cases, plant defense inducers to manage this disease. However, regular prophylactic application of these chemicals is not cost-effective and may not be environmentally friendly. Thrips (Thrips tabaci and Frankliniella fusca) are vectors of P. ananatis, and their feeding may compromise the effectiveness of foliar applications against P. ananatis. In this study, foliar treatments with acibenzolar-S-methyl (Actigard 50WG), cupric hydroxide (Kocide 3000), and Actigard plus Kocide were evaluated for their effectiveness in the presence and absence of thrips infestation at two critical onion growth stages: bulb initiation and bulb swelling. Onion growth stage had no impact on the effectiveness of either Kocide or Actigard. In the absence of thrips, Kocide application resulted in reduced center rot incidence compared with Actigard, regardless of the growth stage. However, when thrips were present, the efficacy of both Kocide and Actigard was reduced, with bulb incidence not significantly different from the nontreated control. In independent greenhouse studies in the presence or absence of thrips, it was observed that use of protective chemicals (Kocide, Actigard, and their combinations) at different rates also affected pathogen progression into internal neck tissue and incidence of bulb rot. These results suggest that thrips infestation can reduce the efficacy of protective chemical treatments against P. ananatis. Thrips feeding on onion foliage and resulting feeding scars could facilitate P. ananatis entry and subsequently compromise the efficacy of protective chemical treatments. Therefore, an effective center rot management strategy should likely include thrips management in addition to bactericides at susceptible growth stages of onion.

Foliar Chemical Protection Against Pantoea ananatis in Onion Is Negated by Thrips Feeding