English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Triazole and benzimidazole fungicides have been used for controlling Fusarium head blight (FHB) in wheat for over two decades. In Brazil, it was only during the last five years that uniform fungicide trials for FHB control have been established yearly, thus contributing to a new large body of fungicide efficacy data for this country. A systematic review of both peer- and non-peer-reviewed studies on chemical control conducted since 2000 in Brazil was performed. Fungicides of interest were the triazoles tebuconazole (TEBU 1x  and TEBU 2x ) and propiconazole (PROP 2x ), and the benzimidazole carbendazim (CARB 2x ). Most fungicides were applied twice, the first at early to mid-flowering and the second 7 to 10 days later. Only TEBU was tested as one or two applications, and thus four treatments were evaluated. For these fungicides, there were 35 trials reporting FHB index and 48 reporting mean yield. Network meta-analytic models were fitted to the data of the log of the means of FHB index for each fungicide and for the nontreated check. The meta-analytic estimates were used to obtain control efficacy ([Formula: see text]), or percent disease reduction relative to the nontreated check. The absolute mean difference ([Formula: see text]) in yield (kg/ha) between the fungicide-treated and the nontreated check plots was also estimated. Yield response relative to the nontreated check ([Formula: see text]) was also calculated based on the difference in the logs of the means of yield between fungicide-treated and nontreated check. The TEBU 1x , TEBU 2x , and CARB 2x  treatments performed similarly with regards to control efficacy (= 59%, 53% and 55%, respectively), and although better than PROP 2x  (47%), the difference was marginally significant. Yield response ([Formula: see text]) was highest for TEBU 2x , ([Formula: see text] = 558 kg/ha, [Formula: see text] = 19.2%) followed by PROP 2x  (497 kg/ha, 16.0%), TEBU 1x  (457 kg/ha, 17.3%), and CARB 2x  (456 kg/ha, 12.8%). For an average 2016 scenario of fungicide plus application costs (F C  = $18 U.S./ha) and average wheat price (W P  = $215 U.S./MT), the probability of breaking even on the financial investment in the four treatments ranged from 59 to 63%. For 140 scenarios (four fungicides) created based on the combination of five W P  ($133 to 266 U.S./MT) and seven F C  ($5 to 35 U.S./ha), the probability of breaking even was &gt;50% for all but two scenarios. The information may serve as a guide for planning future trials and provides a baseline and first step toward optimizing FHB management in Brazil.

Quantitative Review of the Effects of Triazole and Benzimidazole Fungicides on Fusarium Head Blight and Wheat Yield in Brazil