English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Study objectives To identify a fast and reliable method for rapid eye movement (REM) sleep without atonia (RWA) quantification. Methods We analyzed 36 video-polysomnographies (v-PSGs) of isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) patients and 35 controls’ v-PSGs. Patients diagnosed with RBD had: i) RWA, quantified with a reference method, i.e. automatic and artifact-corrected 3-s Sleep Innsbruck Barcelona (SINBAR) index in REM sleep periods (RSPs, i.e. manually selected portions of REM sleep); and ii) v-PSG-documented RBD behaviors. We quantified RWA with other (semi)-automated methods requiring less human intervention than the reference one: the indices proposed by the SINBAR group (the 3-s and 30-s phasic flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), phasic/”any”/tonic mentalis), and the REM atonia, short and long muscle activity indices (in mentalis/submentalis/FDS muscles). They were calculated in whole REM sleep (i.e. REM sleep scored following international guidelines), in RSPs, with and without manual artifact correction. Area under curves (AUC) discriminating iRBD from controls were computed. Using published cut-offs, the indices’ sensitivity and specificity for iRBD identification were calculated. Apnea-hypopnea index in REM sleep (AHIREM) was considered in the analyses. Results RWA indices from FDS muscles alone had the highest AUCs and all of them had 100% sensitivity. Without manual RSP selection and artifact correction, the “30-s phasic FDS” and the “FDS long muscle activity” had the highest specificity (85%) with AHIREM&amp;lt;15/h. RWA indices were less reliable when AHIREM≥15/h. Conclusions If AHIREM&amp;lt;15/h, FDS muscular activity in whole REM sleep and without artifact correction is fast and reliable to rule out RWA.

sleep

Automatic analysis of muscular activity in the flexor digitorum superficialis muscles: a fast screening method for rapid eye movement sleep without atonia