English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is a surgical method of treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). UAS involves an implantable neuro-stimulator that stimulates the hypoglossal nerve to protrude the tongue during sleep. OSA fails to improve in 22% of patients who receive UAS as defined by a &amp;gt; 50% reduction in Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and an AHI &amp;lt;20 events/hour. Light sleep may predict UAS failure in that it may limit the stimulus strength that can be applied. The odds ratio product (ORP) is a novel polysomnographic (PSG) metric of sleep depth. We hypothesized that ORP values prior to surgery will be higher (lighter sleep) in non-responders. Having markers that predict surgical success can help reduce unnecessary surgeries. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of 126 patients (83 responders vs. 43 non-responders) who received UAS implantation for the treatment of OSA. PSG data was obtained from the Stimulation for Apnea Reduction (STAR) trial. Raw baseline PSG data were analyzed and ORP values calculated using Michele Sleep Scoring Software (Cerebra Medical, Winnipeg, CA). In addition, 13 PSG metrics that were considered possibly relevant to surgical outcome were calculated as an exploratory analysis. The measurements included: spindle density, spindle power, spindle frequency, alpha intrusion, Right/Left sleep depth correlation coefficient, respiratory duty cycle, respiratory flow limitation, and arousal intensity. Statistical Analysis: Comparisons between responders and non-responders used parametric t-tests for continuous data and chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical data. Statistical significance was based on a Bonferroni-corrected p&amp;lt;0.00357. Results Differences in ORP values and other PSG metrics between responders and non-responders were not statistically significant. Of all PSG metrics only differences in spindle density approached statistical significance (Responders = 2.33 spindles/minute vs Non-Responders = 1.39 spindles/minute, p=0.00360). Conclusion The findings suggest that differences in sleep depth and several other sleep characteristics do not play a significant role in determining response to UAS therapy. Support This project was supported by a Sleep Research Society Career Development Award #023-JP-19

sleep

0691 Comparison Of Odds Ratio Product And Other Polysomnographic Metrics Among Responders And Non-responders To Upper Airway Stimulation Treatment Of Obstructive Sleep Apnea