English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Insomnia is commonly comorbid with, and may contribute to, hypertension. Cognitive-behavioral treatments improve insomnia, but their effects on hypertension are uncertain, and they are often unavailable in primary care practices, where most INS-HTN patients are treated. We evaluated the efficacy of Brief Behavioral Treatment for Insomnia (BBTI) and Sleep Healthy Using the Internet (SHUTi) compared to enhanced usual care (EUC) on insomnia and home blood pressure (HBP) in primary care patients with INS-HTN. Methods Patients were recruited via electronic health records from 67 primary care practices and randomized 2:2:1 to BBTI delivered via telephone/videoconferencing; SHUTi, an automated, web-based CBT-I program; or EUC including a patient education video. Assessments included self-report questionnaires, home sleep apnea testing, and one week of sleep diary and HBP, measured at Baseline and 9 weeks/ 6 months post-treatment. The primary outcome was the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance scale. Linear mixed models were fitted for continuous variables on the intent-to-treat sample (n=548), adjusting for age and sex. Chi-square tests were used for proportions. Results Patients were 61.8±11.3 years old, 67.2% female, and 55.9% were taking hypnotics. Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was 15.4±4.4, Apnea-Hypopnea Index 9.8±11.4, and HBP 130±14/81±9. BBTI and SHUTi were significantly better than EUC (p≤.002) at 9 weeks and 6 months on PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment scales, ISI, and diary sleep efficiency, but had inconsistent effects on PROMIS depression and anxiety scales (p=0.001-0.9). Greater proportions of BBTI and SHUTi vs. EUC-treated patients had 9-week and 6-month ISI scores &amp;lt;8 (p=.01, p=.04) and ISI changes scores ≥7 (p=.002, p=.003). HBP did not significantly differ by intervention group. Conclusion BBTI and SHUTi improved insomnia, but did not reduce HBP in patients with INS-HTN. These interventions appear suitable for dissemination and implementation in primary care, but may have limited effects on comorbid symptoms and conditions. Support NHLBI UH2/UH3 HL125103

sleep

0489 Initial Results from the Hypertension with Unsatisfactory Sleep Health (HUSH) Clinical Trial for Primary Care Patients with Insomnia and Comorbid Hypertension (INS-HTN)