English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The development of new sleep study devices, adapted for daily use, is necessary for diagnosis of sleep disorders. However, this requires to be both suitable for daily use and capable of recording accurate electrophysiological data. This study assesses the signal acquisition of a comfortable sleep headband, using dry electrodes, and the performance of its automatic sleep staging algorithms compared to the gold-standard clinical PSG scored by 4 sleep experts. Methods 42 participants slept at a sleep center wearing both the Dreem headband (DH) and a PSG simultaneously. We measured 1) the EEG signal similarity between both devices, 2) heart rate, breathing frequency and respiration rate variability (RRV) agreement, and 3) the performance of the headband automatic sleep scoring compared to PSG sleep experts manual scoring. Results Results demonstrate a strong correlation between the EEG signals acquired by the headband and those from the PSG, and the signals acquired by the headband enable monitoring of alpha (r= 0.75 ± 0.11), beta (r= 0.74 ± 0.14), delta (r = 0.78 ± 0.16), and theta (r = 0.63 ± 0.15) frequencies during sleep. The mean absolute error for heart rate, breathing frequency, and RRV was 2.2 ± 0.8 bpm, 0.3 ± 0.2 cpm and 3.1 ± 0.4 %, respectively. Automatic Sleep Staging reached an overall accuracy of 84.1 ± 7.5% (F1 score: 83.0 ± 8.4) for the headband to be compared with an average of 86.4 ± 5.5% (F1 score: 86.5 ± 5.5) for the 4 sleep experts. Conclusion These results demonstrate the capacity of the headband to both precisely monitor sleep-related physiological signals and process them accurately into sleep stages. This device paves the way for high-quality, large-scale, longitudinal sleep studies. Support This Study has been supported by Dreem sas.

1211 Assessing the Accuracy of a Dry-EEG Headband for Measuring Brain Activity, Heart Rate, Breathing and Automatic Sleep Staging