English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

sensitivity (τ = .024, P = .80). ASI was related to willingness to expend effort (τ = .283, P < .001), especially when outcome predictions required greater mental computation or were uncertain (τ = .170, P < .05 to τ = .293, P < .001). There was a negative relationship between SAT AS and effort for larger more likely rewards (τ = −.169, P < .05). While higher explicit adaptive salience predicted less effort for small (τ = −.165, P < .05) or unlikely rewards (τ = −.188, P < .05), higher implicit adaptive salience predicted less effort for both low (τ = −.158, P < .05) and high rewards (τ = −.177, P < .05) when likelihood of winning was high. Loss sensitivity negatively correlated with willingness to expend effort for larger more likely rewards (τ = .199, P < .05). Conclusion: The findings support the predicted relationships between reward sensitivity and reward motivation and AS and reward motivation but not AS and reward sensitivity. The lack of relationship between AS measures, and their different relationship to reward motivation, suggests caution in interpreting current literature due to the wide variance in AS measures used. Future research should examine the relationships among measures of aberrant salience and reward processing in patients with schizophrenia.

SA41. The Unpredictable Body: Mechanisms Underlying Altered Mapping of the Bodily Self in Schizophrenia