z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Diagnosis of Schizophrenia: A Critical Review of Current Diagnostic Systems
Author(s) -
Wayne S. Fenton,
Loren R. Mosher,
Susan Matthews
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
schizophrenia bulletin
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.823
H-Index - 190
eISSN - 1745-1701
pISSN - 0586-7614
DOI - 10.1093/schbul/7.3.452
Subject(s) - schizophrenia (object oriented programming) , psychology , construct (python library) , reliability (semiconductor) , diagnosis of schizophrenia , predictive validity , construct validity , clinical psychology , rank (graph theory) , psychiatry , cognitive psychology , psychometrics , psychosis , computer science , quantum mechanics , programming language , combinatorics , physics , mathematics , power (physics)
The data relevant to the evaluation of six systems for diagnosing schizophrenia are reviewed. They are summarized in terms of the reliability, predictive validity, specificity, and comprehensiveness of each system. Unfortunately, none, of these systems (Schneider's First-rank Symptoms, New Haven Schizophrenia Index, Flexible System, Feighner Criteria, Research Diagnostic Criteria, and DSM-III) have established construct validity. It is noted therefore that they are all, in a sense, arbitrary. Choosing one over another cannot be data-based. Because the elevation of any one diagnostic system to an official status is thought to be premature, clinicians and researchers alike are advised to exercise caution and openmindedness in their use of DSM-III. There is as yet no evidence that its criteria for schizophrenia are either less arbitrary or better (in identifying a group of "true" schizophrenics) than those of other systems or DSM-II.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom