English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background/Aims Previous research has suggested that switching between b/tsDMARDs with different mode of action may be more effective than switching agents within the same mechanism of action. Limited data exists about the impact of an inadequate response to a previous JAK-inhibitor (JAKi) on subsequent JAKi effectiveness. Methods This is a nested study within the Swiss Clinical Quality Management (SCQM) registry of RA patients. All patients initiating baricitinib treatment courses (BARI) between 01-09-2017 and 01-06-2020, with at least one follow-up visit, were included. We compared the time to treatment discontinuation, as a measure of drug effectiveness, of BARI with a previous history of an inadequate response (IR) to tofacitinib (“BARI-post-TOFA”) or without (“BARI-initial”). Tofacitinib IR was defined as previous tofacitinib treatment discontinuation for adverse events or for ineffectiveness. Baseline characteristics were compared using t-tests or χ2. We used Kaplan-Meier curve to display crude time to discontinuation and a Cox model to estimate adjusted hazard ratio (HR). Cox model was adjusted for potential confounding factors: age, BMI, concomitant csDMARD, concomitant steroid usage, baseline CDAI, disease duration, smoking status, line of therapy, gender and seropositivity to RF/ACPA. Results Of the 273 included BARI, 72 were initiated in patients with a history of a previous tofacitinib IR (Table 1). No differences were found between the “BARI-post-TOFA” and the “BARI-initial” groups in terms of time-to-discontinuation, as demonstrated by both the unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (Log-rank p = 0.44) and the fully adjusted Cox analysis (Hazard Ratio BARI-post-TOFA vs BARI-initial = 0.76 (95% IC [0.42 - 1.34]; p = 0.34). Other covariates significantly associated with drug maintenance were active smoking (p = 0.03) and CDAI score (p &amp;lt; 0.01). Conclusion In this preliminary analysis, a history of prior tofacitinib IR did not appear to significantly impact subsequent drug maintenance of baricitinib. Disclosure B.T.P. Gilbert: Other; Invited speaker for Lilly Symposium SGR Congress Lausanne (2021). D.S. Courvoisier: None. D. Mongin: None. K. Lauper: None. V.A. Guimaraes: Other; Clinical Research Scientist Immunology at Eli Lilly (Suisse) S.A. R.B. Mueller: None. A. Finckh: Grants/research support; Invited speaker and consultant for Eli Lilly. Has received research grant from Eli Lilly.

rheumatology

P188 Baricitinib effectiveness after a previous inadequate response to an alternative JAK inhibitor: results from the Swiss rheumatoid arthritis register