English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Fingertip comprises the nail complex and glabrous pulp, which is richly vascularized and innervated, built around the distal phalanx. The fingertip is commonly affected because it is the most distal part of the hand so it's easily to be injured during athletic participation, occupational activities or in accidents. Various fingertip reconstruction methods are reported as healing by secondary intention, shortening and primary closure, skin grafts and flaps. Flaps are considered when there's a big soft tissue loss or an exposed bone. Complications of fingertip reconstructions are common such as flexion deformity and neuroma. Objective In this study, we assessed and compared the outcomes of different modalities of soft tissue covemge using different flap techniques in cases of fingertip injuries as regalding the incidence of neuroma, necrosis, donor site morbidity, joint stiffness and sensory impairment, together with the patient satisfaction. Patients and Methods We analyzed a retrospective cohort study of 90 patients with 96 fingertip injuries who underwent coverage by various flap techniques at Ain Shams University Hospitals in the period between July 2017 and July 2019. Results The V-Y Advancement flap and the Cross-finger flap were the commonest flaps done in 26 cases (27.1%) and 25 cases (26.0%) respectively. There's a highly statistically significance in the incidence of necrosis in abdominal flap (100%) followed by Moberg flap (46.2%). In addition, there is a statistically significance in the incidence of neuroma in Moberg flap (53.8%). Most of patients who underwent coverage by flap technique were very satisfied by the results (60.4%). Conclusion Many techniques have been described for reconstruction of fingertip trauma including revision amputation, skin grafting, local flaps, distant flaps and free flaps. The treatment choice depends on many factors such as patient preference, culture, resources available and surgeon skills. The goals of reconstruction in fingertip amputations are to cover the defect with a satisfactory cosmetic appearance, establish maximum function and preservation of sensation.

Evaluation of Fingertip Injuries and Modalities of Flap Coverage in the Emergency Settings: A Retrospective Study