English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

BACKGROUND Suicide is the second leading cause of death among Canadian children and adolescents. Youth who present at an Emergency Department (ED) for suicidal ideation and risk behaviours (SRB) are at increased risk for eventual suicide. Despite this risk, current approaches to standard of care are referral to community resources or primary care where waitlists are common, and interventions may not be evidence-based or incorporate crisis management or family participation. OBJECTIVES To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a manualized, family-centered suicide prevention intervention administered in an outpatient clinic for ED-referred youth. DESIGN/METHODS Youth (aged 12 – 18) and parents presenting to the ED for SRB and referred to the Urgent Psychiatry Care clinic were eligible for the QI program, consisting of weekly individual and family sessions delivered over a 6-week period. The therapist addressed common symptoms and concerns of suicidal youth, sources of conflict within the family, and ways to improve communication and ensure patient safety. Patients were excluded if they did not have a parent or caregiver able to participate. Suicidal ideation and behavior were assessed using youth-report measures, the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire-Junior (SIQ-JR) and the Harkavy-Asnis Suicide Scale (HASS), at baseline and following program completion. The Mood and Feeling Questionnaire (MFQ) was used to measure depressive symptoms. Participant and therapist feedback was collected at follow-up using quantitative and qualitative measures. RESULTS Ten patients were enrolled and completed baseline measures, however four participants withdrew prior to 6 week completion: two withdrew at week 2 and one participant each withdrew at weeks 3 and 6. As such, 7/10 completed 5 weeks of the intervention. Significant improvement in both suicidal ideation (SIQ-JR, x̅ = -16.67; t(5) = 3.125, p = .026) and SRB (HASS, x̅ = -20.17; t(5) = 3.204, p = .024) were observed. Depressive symptoms also decreased (MFQ, x̅ = -15.5, t(5) = 2.724, p = .042). Youth and caregivers rated the program favorably. Improved family communication was most frequently reported by both patients and caregivers as a main benefit of the program. CONCLUSION These preliminary data indicate that SRB may be improved by a brief manualized, family-focused therapy. Early data suggest that the protocol is feasible and acceptable for adolescents presenting to the ED with safety concerns, and warrant further examination in a controlled trial.

paediatrics and child health

FEASIBILITY OF A MANUALIZED FAMILY-BASED SUICIDE PREVENTION STRATEGY TO REDUCE ADOLESCENT SUICIDE RISK AMONG EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT REFERRED YOUTH: A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT