English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this brief account of the way in which the programme for the XIHrd Congress of our Association was formulated, I will focus first on the changes implemented by the EDTAERA Council in the selection process and second, on an analysis of this year's yield of abstracts. The Council of our Association decided during its meeting in the Autumn of 1985 to further expand our society into a major forum to discuss renal physiology and pathophysiology, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases. We therefore divided the selection process of the submitted abstracts into several subsections with the intention of providing a balanced final programme and to broaden the selection expertise. The first step in selection was entrusted to nine panels of five members each. In order to broaden the expertise of the various panels, we selected ten council members and 30 internationally known referees from 13 countries (Table 1). All abstracts were thus read by people especially competent in each field. I, as Chairman of the Paper Selection Committee, am very grateful to all of them: they performed excellent work within a very short period of time, enabling the panel chairmen to make an adequate synthesis and thereby providing a coherent programme. The deadline for abstracts was 1 February, and the meeting at which the final programme was assembled was only six weeks later. In this time 838 abstracts were sent to panel

How was the Programme of the EDTA–ERA Congress in Budapest Established?