English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The performances of five global multiple-sequence alignment programs (CLUSTAL W, Divide and Conquer, Malign, PileUp, and TreeAlign) were evaluated using part of the animal mitochondrial small subunit (12S) rRNA molecule. Conserved sequence motifs derived from an alignment based on secondary structural information were used to score how well each program aligned a data set of five vertebrate and five invertebrate taxa over a range of parameter values. All of the programs could align the motifs with reasonable accuracy for at least one set of parameter conditions, although if the whole sequence was considered, similarity to the structural alignment was only 25%-34%. Use of small gap costs generally gave more accurate results, although Malign and TreeAlign generated longer alignments when gap costs were low. The programs differed in the consistency of the alignments when gap cost was varied; CLUSTAL W, Divide and Conquer, and TreeAlign were the most accurate and robust, while PileUp performed poorly as gap cost values increased, and the accuracy of Malign fluctuated. Default settings for the programs did not give the best results, and attempting to select similar parameter values in different programs did not always result in more similar alignments. Poor alignment of even well-conserved motifs can occur if these are near sites with insertions or deletions. Since there is no a priori way to determine gap costs and because such costs can vary over the gene, alignment of rRNA sequences, particularly the less well conserved regions, should be treated carefully and aided by secondary structure and conserved motifs. Some motifs are single bases and so are often invisible to alignment programs. Our tests involved the most conserved regions of the 12S rRNA gene, and alignment of less well conserved regions will be more problematical. None of the alignments we examined produced a fully resolved phylogeny for the data set, indicating that this portion of 12S rRNA is insufficient for resolution of distant evolutionary relationships.

The Performance of Several Multiple-Sequence Alignment Programs in Relation to Secondary-Structure Features for an rRNA Sequence