English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

For more than two decades, the news media has bombarded the public with often conflicting information about health risks, contributing to an atmosphere of hype and hysteria about cancer and other diseases. Improvements in media reporting of health risks require greater efforts by both those who cover the news and those who create it. Guidelines for bringing more perspective and balance to media coverage of risk are provided. These include putting cancer in context with other diseases, explaining absolute and relative risks, differentiating between individual and population risks, stressing the degree of uncertainty of new research and how it fits with previous data, covering the process as well as end results of science, understanding different media constraints and needs, and taking into account the diverse backgrounds and needs of the target audience-the general public.

Living Can Be Hazardous to Your Health: How the News Media Cover Cancer Risks