English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background Improving antimicrobial use is a key component of controlling antimicrobial resistance. Multiple factors influence inpatient provider antimicrobial prescribing decisions, making it challenging to develop standard methods to evaluate prescribing quality in hospitals. In 2015, CDC’s Emerging Infections Program (EIP) conducted a hospital antimicrobial use prevalence survey and collected data to assess prescribing quality in selected scenarios, including fluoroquinolone (FQ) treatment. Methods EIP sites (CA, CO, CT, GA, MD, MN, NM, NY, OR, TN) each recruited up to 25 hospitals for the survey. Each hospital selected a survey date during May–September 2015. Among randomly selected inpatients on the survey date, EIP staff identified those ≥18 years old who received FQ treatment on the survey date or the day prior and reviewed medical records to gather data on underlying conditions, infections, and diagnostic tests. We used these data to update a previously developed prescribing quality assessment pathway that categorized FQ treatment as supported or unsupported based on medical record documentation. Results Among 12,299 patients in 199 hospitals, 1084 (8.7%) received FQ treatment; 756 (70%) were treated for a single infection type during their hospitalization and were ≥18 years old. The pathway categorized FQ treatment as supported for 646 (85.4%) and unsupported for 110 patients (14.6%) (figure). Almost half of unsupported treatment was due to a lack of compatible signs or symptoms of infection in a patient from whom an organism susceptible or likely susceptible to an FQ was identified from a nonsterile site (49/110 patients, 44.5%), suggesting colonization. Conclusion Utilization of a pathway that incorporates detailed clinical data enabled us to apply a standard approach to assess FQ prescribing quality in hospitals. A high percentage of FQ treatment was supported, possibly reflecting efforts in recent years to reduce inappropriate use. Our assessment approach also identified opportunities for further improvements in inpatient FQ stewardship. Incorporation of additional elements in the pathway, such as the availability of other antibiotic choices in clinical scenarios where FQ use is currently supported (e.g., pneumonia) could further enhance the pathway’s performance. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

open forum infectious diseases

1009. Measuring the quality of fluoroquinolone prescribing in hospitals: results from the Emerging Infections Program Hospital Prevalence Survey Antimicrobial Quality Assessment