English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Gepotidacin (GSK2140944) is a novel triazaacenaphthylene bacterial type II topoisomerase inhibitor in clinical development for the treatment of gonorrhea and uncomplicated UTI (acute cystitis). Gepotidacin selectively inhibits bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV by a unique mechanism not utilized by any currently approved therapeutic agent and demonstrates in vitro activity against most target pathogens resistant to established antibacterials, including fluoroquinolones. This study tested the equivalency of minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) obtained by 2 reference susceptibility testing methods, agar dilution (AD) and broth microdilution (BMD), for gepotidacin against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. Methods Susceptibility testing for both methods was performed on a total of 733 clinical isolates recovered largely in 2016 from over 120 medical centers worldwide. For N. gonorrhoeae, only the AD method is recommended by CLSI, therefore BMD was performed using Fastidious Broth for comparison purposes. Essential agreement (EA) based on evaluable results was calculated as the number of isolates with MICs within one 2-fold dilution of the reference method divided by the total number of results. Equivalency was defined using the 95% criteria from the FDA’s class II controls document. Results The EA observed for gepotidacin with these 2 methods was 85.8% overall and 98.3% when H. influenzae and N. gonorrhoeae isolates were excluded. Slightly higher gepotidacin MICs were observed when tested by BMD for each of these species/groups; this trend was especially prominent for E. coli and S. pyogenes. Gepotidacin tested against H. influenzae (73.1%) or N. gonorrhoeae (28.6%) species had much lower EAs. Conclusion Equivalency (EA &gt;95%) was established between AD and BMD methods for determining gepotidacin susceptibility results against Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp. and E. coli. However, for N. gonorrhoeae and H. influenzae, equivalency between the 2 methods was not established; therefore, future antimicrobial susceptibility testing for gepotidacin against these organisms should adhere to the methods for which quality control ranges and breakpoints are approved. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

701. Comparison of MIC Results for Gepotidacin by Agar Dilution and Broth Microdilution Methods