English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Care for patients with infectious endocarditis is complicated by delays in diagnosis and relatively low sensitivity of existing diagnostic algorithms, particularly the Duke Criteria. In recent years, cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) has been identified as a useful tool in detecting occult endocardial infections. Multiple prospective studies have demonstrated that when incorporated with conventional imaging modalities cardiac PET can improve the sensitivity of the Duke Criteria by 27–38 percent. These studies used as their gold standard for diagnosis the consensus opinion of an endocarditis team and were characterized by a relatively low percentage of patients who underwent surgery. We reviewed 4 years of surgically managed IE cases at a tertiary care center where cardiac PET was used to aid diagnosis. Methods Between July 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 we retrospectively reviewed 68 surgically managed cases of endocarditis. Cases were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes of patients who underwent surgical valve replacement for endocarditis as well as all patients who had cardiac PET scans to rule out endocarditis. Variables including PET results, operative findings, valve culture, pathology and PCR testing were recorded. Results 14 patients were identified who underwent cardiac PET prior to their surgical intervention. 9 cases were classified as possible endocarditis by Duke Criteria and 10 involved prosthetic valves. 12/14 scans were interpreted as suggestive of or consistent with endocarditis. Twelve positive PETs were associated with either operative findings of infection and/or positive PCR testing on the excised valve (positive predictive value: 100%). The 2 patients with negative scans were found to have noninfectious vegetations intra-operatively, negative valve cultures and negative pathology. Conclusion Cardiac PET correlates closely with intra-operative findings in patients with endocarditis. In patients with suspected endocarditis it may help guide surgical decision making. Cardiac PET should be considered for addition to the Modified Duke’s Criteria similar to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

203. Correlating Cardiac PET Results with Intra-Operative Findings in Infectious Endocarditis