z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
2757. Pragmatic Assessment of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the DoD (PAIVED): Immunogenicity Sub-Study
Author(s) -
Rhonda E Colombo,
Stephanie A Richard,
Christina Schofield,
Limone Collins,
Anuradha Ganesan,
Casey Geaney,
Tahaniyat Lalani,
Ana E Markelz,
Ryan C. Maves,
Katrin Mende,
Srihari Seshadri,
Christina Spooner,
Gregory Utz,
Tyler Warkentien,
Christian Coles,
Timothy Burgess
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
open forum infectious diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.546
H-Index - 35
ISSN - 2328-8957
DOI - 10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2434
Subject(s) - medicine , immunogenicity , vaccination , influenza vaccine , cohort , cohort study , immunology , immune system
Background Despite greater than 90% of US active duty (AD) military personnel receiving influenza vaccination annually, vaccine effectiveness (VE) among AD members has been substantially lower than in groups with less vaccine uptake. The substrate used in vaccine production may impact immunogenicity and thus VE. The PAIVED study is investigating VE of 3 different influenza vaccine formulations; a sub-study assesses immunogenicity. This analysis compares demographic characteristics and influenza-like illness (ILI) experience among main and sub-study participants for the first year of PAIVED. Methods During the 2018–2019 influenza season, PAIVED enrolled participants at 5 military medical centers, recruiting sub-study subjects from the main cohort excluding marine recruits. All participants were randomized (1:1:1) to receive either egg-based, cell-culture based or recombinant influenza vaccine. At enrollment, participants provided key demographic and behavioral data. Weekly surveillance for ILI symptoms was performed electronically. Sub-study volunteers underwent an additional blood draw prior to and at 21–35 days post vaccination ± an optional buccal swab. Results 200 (23.5%) of 852 non-recruit PAIVED participants enrolled in the immunogenicity sub-study. Similar to the main cohort, 46% of sub-study volunteers were female, 85% were physically active, and 6% smoked tobacco. Sub-study participants were younger (47 ± 16 years vs. 51 ± 17 years, P = 0.004) and more likely to be AD (34% vs. 22%, P = 0.001). Although 70% of both groups identified as White, the percent African American (20% sub-study; 13% main), Asian (3%; 7%), multi-racial (2%; 5%), and unknown (6%; 4%) differed (P = 0.02). More sub-study participants developed an ILI (19% vs. 12%, P = 0.02). Conclusion The convenience sampling method used for recruitment into the sub-study was effective. The younger age and higher AD status in the sub-study group may be informative for evaluation of military readiness issues. The greater incidence of ILI in the sub-study increases the chance differences in immune response by vaccine type may be interpretable in the context of circulating influenza strains. Targeted efforts to enhance recruitment of a racially diverse sub-study cohort may be warranted. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom