English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Randomized controlled trials of procalcitonin (PCT)-based algorithms for antibacterial therapy have been shown to reduce antimicrobial use and improve survival. Translation of PCT algorithms to clinical settings has often been unsuccessful. Methods We implemented a PCT algorithm, supported by focus groups prior to introduction of the PCT test in April 2016 and clinician training on the PCT algorithm for testing and antimicrobial management after test roll-out. The standard PCT algorithm period (SPAP) was defined as October 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018. The antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) initiated an AST-supported PCT algorithm (ASPA) in August 2018. The AST prospectively evaluated patients admitted to ICU for sepsis and ordered PCT per algorithm if the primary medical team had not ordered them. The ASPA period was defined as October 1, 2018–March 31, 2019. The AST conducted concurrent review and feedback for all antibiotic orders during both periods, using PCT result when available. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes between the two periods. The primary outcome was adherence to the PCT algorithm, with subcomponents of appropriate PCT orders and antimicrobial discontinuation. Secondary outcomes were total antibiotic days, excess antibiotic days avoided, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission and mortality. Continuous variables were analyzed with Student t-test. Categorical variables were analyzed with chi-square or Mann–Whitney test, as appropriate. Results There were 35 cases in the SPAP cohort and 57 cases in the ASPA cohort. There were no differences in demographics or infection site (Table 1). Baseline PCT was ordered in 57% of the SPAP cohort and 90% of the ASPA cohort (P = 0.0006) (Table 2). Follow-up PCT was performed in 23% of SPAP and 76% of ASPA (P &lt; 0.0001). Antibiotics were discontinued per algorithm in 2/35 (7%) in the SPAP cohort and 25/57 (44%) in the ASPA cohort (P &lt; 0.0001). Total antibiotic days was 7 (IQR 4–10) in the SPAP cohort and 5 (IQR 2–7) in the ASPA cohort (P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in LOS, ICU LOS, 30-day readmission, or mortality (Table 4). Conclusion A PCT algorithm successfully implemented by an AST was associated with a significant decrease in total antibiotic days. There were no differences in mortality or LOS. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

2005. Successful Implementation of a Procalcitonin Algorithm Associated with Reduction in Antibiotic Days