English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (Ent) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) are involved in a considerable number of healthcare-associated infections, thus representing a therapeutic challenge. Ceftolozane–tazobactam (C/T) is a combination of a novel cephalosporin with a known β-lactamase inhibitor. Ceftolozane has high affinity for penicillin-binding proteins, improved outer membrane permeability, increased stability against efflux and enhanced stability against chromosomal AmpC β-lactamases compared with other β-lactam antibiotics. This agent is not active against carbapenemases. We evaluated the in vitro activity of C/T against clinical isolates of Ent and Pae collected from 2016- 2017 and compared it to the activity of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. Methods 1.644 Ent and Pae non-duplicate clinical isolates were collected in 13 medical centers located in 12 Colombian cities. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were performed by broth microdilution and interpreted according to current CLSI guidelines. Isolates tested included 813 Escherichia coli (Eco), 441 Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kpn), 82 Enterobacter spp., (Enb); 60 Serratia marcescens (Sma) and 248 Pae. Comparator agents were ceftriaxone (CRO), cefotaxime (CTX), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefepime (FEP), piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), ertapenem (ETP), imipenem (IMI), meropenem (MEM). Results Susceptibilities to C/T and comparators of 4 Ent species and Pae are shown in Table 1. Compared with other β-lactams such as CRO, CAZ, TZP, and FEP, C/T had considerably higher susceptibility rates against ESBL, non-carbapenem-resistant (CR) Eco and Kpn isolates. C/T MIC50/90 were: Eco (≤1/≤1); Kpn (≤1/128); Enb (≤1/64); Sma (≤1/≥256); Pae (≤1/≥256). In the case of P.aeruginosa despite the high resistance rates observed in the study, C/T had the best susceptibility, even higher than the carbapenems. Conclusion Overall, C/T demonstrated higher in vitro activity than currently available cephalosporins and TZP when tested against Ent and Pae. C/T provides an important treatment option against infections caused by non-carbapenemase producing Gram-negative pathogens. Further studies are warranted to identify an emerging mechanism of resistance in Colombia. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

open forum infectious diseases

1581. Comparative In Vitro Activity of Ceftolozane/tazobactam and Comparator Agents Against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Clinical Isolates in Colombia