English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background Transmission of antibiotic-resistant bacteria during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been linked to the complex design of the duodenoscope (scope) elevator channel and cantilever. We implemented a scope culturing program to monitor the efficacy of disinfection and to identify frequency of pre-disinfection exposure to antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Methods Facilities performing ERCPs within the Intermountain Healthcare system voluntarily submit scope cultures to the Infectious Diseases Epidemiology Laboratory. Cultures are collected at designated intervals based on procedure volumes at each site. Samples are submitted by endoscopy techs trained to collect flush and swab samples of the distal end of the scope using a previously described method before (PRE) and after (POST) high-level disinfection. Selective media is used to screen for Gram-negative bacilli-resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (ESBL) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). Results Between March 7, 2016 and April 18, 2018, 1,255 scope samples from 10 facilities were cultured (533 PRE samples and 722 POST samples). 483 (90.6%) PRE samples were positive, with 75 (15.5%) screening positive for an antibiotic-resistant organism (60 ESBL and 15 VRE). 19 (2.6%) POST samples were positive, with 4 (21.1%) screening positive for ESBL. One of the four ESBL positive POST samples had a corresponding PRE sample for comparison; E. coli and Klebsiella variicola were isolated in both indicating residual contamination. Two of the ESBL-positive POST cultures did not have corresponding PRE samples and one had a PRE culture negative for ESBL. No POST samples contained VRE. Endoscopy personnel were contacted for each positive POST culture and endoscopy reprocessing practices were reviewed. Additionally, scopes were quarantined, reprocessed and re-cultured. Scopes were returned to use once POST cultures were negative. Conclusion Contamination of scopes with antibiotic-resistant bacteria during ERCP is common. High-level disinfection is effective at reducing bacterial burden but is imperfect. Routine surveillance for post-reprocessing bacterial colonization has been helpful to minimize patient exposure and to maintain focus on the importance of reprocessing. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

open forum infectious diseases

1197. Microbiological Surveillance of Duodenoscopes Before and After High-Level Disinfection Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)