English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background  Candidemia is a rare but serious complication of SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization. Combining non-culture and culture-based diagnostics allows earlier identification of candidemia. Given higher reported incidence during COVID-19 surges, we investigated the use of (1-3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) assay at our institution in those who did and did not develop candidemia.    Methods  Retrospective study of adults admitted to The Mount Sinai Hospital between March 15-June 30 2020 for SARS-CoV-2 infection, with either ≥1 BDG assay or positive fungal blood culture. Data was collected with the electronic medical record and Vigilanz. A BDG value ≥ 80 was used as a positivity cutoff. Differences in mortality were assessed by univariate logistic regression using R (version 4.0.0). Statistical significance was measured by  P  value < .05.    Results  There were 75 patients with ≥1 BDG assay resulted and 28 patients with candidemia, with an overlap of 9 between the cohorts. Among the 75 who had BDG assay, 23 resulted positive and 52 negative. Nine of 75 patients developed candidemia. Of the 23 with a positive assay, 5 developed candidemia and 18 did not. Seventeen of the 18 had blood cultures drawn within 7 days +/- of BDG assay. Four patients with candidemia had persistently negative BDG; 2 had cultures collected within 7 days +/- of BDG assay. With a cut-off of >80, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 0.92. When the cut-off increased to >200, NPV was 0.97 and positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.42. Average antifungal days in patients with negative BDG was 2.6 vs. 4.2 in those with a positive. Mortality was 74% in those with ≥1 positive BDG vs. 50% in those with persistently negative BDGs. There was a trend towards higher odds of death in those with positive BDG (OR = 2.83, 95% CI: 1.00-8.90, p < 0.06).    Conclusion  There was substantial use of BDG to diagnose candidemia at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Blood cultures were often drawn at time of suspected candidemia but not routinely. When cultures and BDG were drawn together, BDG had a high NPV but low PPV. High NPV of BDG likely contributed to discontinuation of empiric antifungals. The candidemic COVID-19 patients had high mortality, so further investigation of algorithms for the timely diagnosis of candidemia are needed to optimize use of antifungals while improving mortality rates.Disclosures    All Authors : No reported disclosures

316. Use of (1-3)-β-D-Glucan Assay for Diagnosis of Candidemia in Patients Hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 Infection