English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Ceftriaxone-susceptible (CRO-S) and piperacillin-tazobactam-non susceptible (TZP-NS) Enterobacterales isolates have become a frequently isolated phenotype emerging in practice. The genotypic profile is still not clearly elucidated, although prior genotypic sequencing data of these isolates with this phenotypic profile suggests that they are not extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers. Due to the unfamiliarity with this phenotype and the potential for overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics, we investigated the clinical outcomes of CRO-S/TZP-NS isolates with carbapenem versus non-carbapenem beta-lactam (NCBL) therapy. Methods This was a retrospective chart review of patients with a diagnosed infection caused by a CRO-S/TZP-NS Enterobacterales isolate admitted to any of the three NYU hospitals: Long Island, Tisch, or Brooklyn campuses, treated with a beta-lactam (BL) antibiotic from October 2015 to October 2020. The primary outcome was treatment failure defined as an escalation of antibiotics due to clinical worsening, 30-day all-cause mortality, or relapse of infection with the same genus and species. Patients who received ≥ 72 consecutive hours of BL antibiotics were considered to be on definitive therapy. Results A total of 111 patients were included in this study, 9 in the carbapenem group and 102 in the NCBL group. There was no statistically significant difference in the clinical failure rate between the two groups (0% vs 10.8% respectively, P=0.56). A univariate analysis assessed the association of clinical failure with TZP, CRO, cefpodoxime, cefepime, and 1st-3rd generation cephalosporins grouped. There were no statistically significant increases in 30-day treatment failure in any of the individual categories. Conclusion There were no statistically significant differences in 30-day failure with the use of carbapenem vs NCBL antibiotics. No individual BLs or classes were associated with an increased risk of clinical failure. This study suggests that there is a role for NCBL antibiotics for Enterobacterales isolates with this phenotypic presentation and supports prior data that they are less likely to be ESBL producers. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

open forum infectious diseases

1259. Carbapenems Versus Non-carbapenem Beta-Lactams for the Treatment of Ceftriaxone-Susceptible and Piperacillin-Tazobactam-Nonsusceptible Enterobacterales Isolates