English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

OBJECTIVE: A major challenge in the follow-up of patients managed with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) is to differentiate pseudoprogression (PP) from tumor recurrence (TR). A clinical score based on tumor and treatment related factors would be valuable when selecting appropriate treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Follow-up images of 97 consecutive patients treated with SRS for 406 BM were analyzed. Of these 100 (24.6 %) BM in 48 (49.5 %) patients responded either with TR (delayed growth; 53 (13.1 %) BM) or PP (temporary volume increase; 47 (11.6 %) BM). Differences between the 2 groups were analyzed and used to develop a PP risk assessment score (PP-RAS). RESULTS: Significant factors associated with a higher incidence of PP versus TR were: primary lung cancer vs. other primaries, BM volume ≤ 2cc (or BM ≤ 1.5 cm in diameter), Target cover ratio &amp;gt; 98 % and prior radiation SRS or WBRT. Based on the presence (0) or not (1) of these 5 parameters, a risk assessment score for PP versus TR was established. A PP-RAS score of 0 corresponds with high likelihood of PP vs. TR, whereas a score of 5 corresponds with a high risk of TR. A score of ≤ 1 point was associated with 100 % PP, 2 points with 57 % PP and 43 % TR, 3 points with 57 % TR and 43 % PP, whereas ≥ 4 points were associated with 84 % TR and 16 % PP, π=24.57, df =4, p &amp;lt; 0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on these 5 parameters at the time of SRS our risk assessment score could robustly differentiate between PP versus growth following SRS. The score is user-friendly and may be a useful tool to guide the decision making whether to retreat or observe at appropriate follow-up intervals.

neuro-oncology advances

RADI-23. CLINICAL RISK ASSESSMENT SCORE TO ESTIMATE THE LIKELIHOOD OF PSEUDOPROGRESSION VERSUS TUMOR RECURRENCE FOLLOWING STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN METASTASES