English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Survival had been poor in several multi-center/national studies since the 1980s attempting to delay, avoid or minimize brain irradiation in young children with medulloblastoma. The introduction of regimens in Germany incorporating both intravenous high-dose (HD-MTX) and intraventricular (IVENT-MTX) methotrexate, as well as regimens in North America incorporating marrow-ablative chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic cell rescue (HDCx+AuHCR), have reported encouraging outcomes. The objective of this report is to perform a comparative outcomes analysis of these differing strategies. METHODS Data from 17 prospective multi-center trials published between 1990 and 2018 for children under six years old with medulloblastoma were reviewed; event-free (EFS) and overall survivals (OS) were compared. RESULTS Two trials using full-dose cranio-spinal irradiation with or without chemotherapy reported 5-year survivals of 32–38%. Three trials using standard chemotherapy with delayed irradiation reported 2-4-year EFS and OS of 23–34% and 31–46%. Two trials employing standard chemotherapy without irradiation reported 3-5-year EFS and OS of 22–33% and 34–43%. Four trials incorporating HD-MTX with or without IVENT-MTX reported 5-10-year EFS and OS of 56–59% and 67–80%, and 31% and 59% respectively; one trial with HD-MTX without IVENT-MTX for localized desmoplastic/nodular medulloblastoma (DN-MB) reported 2-year EFS and OS of 52% and 92%. Finally, five trials employing induction chemotherapy, with or without HD-MTX, followed by single or tandem HDCx+AuHCR have reported 3-5-year EFS and OS of 45–60% and 60–70%. CONCLUSIONS The best survivals are observed in trials including HD-MTX and IVENT-MTX or including HD-MTX during induction followed by HDCx+AuHCR. Because histology/biology (classic and large cell/anaplastic versus DN-MB; SHH versus non-SHH subtypes) have crucial prognostic roles, EFS and irradiation-free survival advantages require analysis in these settings. The benefit of these trials appears true for all young children with medulloblastoma. Risk-adapted treatment stratification for young children may be improved by molecular profiling of SHH- and non-SHH medulloblastoma.

neuro-oncology

PDCT-03. CHEMOTHERAPY STRATEGIES FOR YOUNG CHILDREN NEWLY DIAGNOSED WITH MEDULLOBLASTOMA UP TO THE ERA OF MOLECULAR PROFILING – A COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES ANALYSIS